Political Quotes

On the recordApril 19, 1994
In other words, the companies the gentleman is describing are investing real dollars in health care cost control, in prevention, and wellness, and getting their employees involved, and early intervention and all those things to make for better health and controlling the costs of health care, and all of those investments would essentially have to be withdrawn because their payroll tax for health care would be the same as the payroll tax in the company down the street who did not make any investment at all, and over time they would be forced to redirect their dollars from investing in health care cost control to R&D, or something like that, because there are no investments they would make under the employer mandate. it would not make any difference in the cost of their health care because the cost of that company's health care would be a percent of payroll based on the adjusted average premium, not of their employees even, but in the area. So companies would finally, because they could not get any benefit from their investment in wellness, would finally cease to make it, and that is what is so sort of sad about the employer mandate.
Said by
Nancy L. Johnson
Connecticut

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of the employer mandate on health care investments during a floor debate.

Share

More from Nancy L. Johnson

May 11, 1999

It is with great pleasure that I rise to honor Dr. George R. Muirhead upon his retirement from Central Connecticut State University in my hometown of New Britain, Connecticut.

congress.gov
Mar 16, 1994

I'm delighted to answer that question. In fact only a Democrat could possibly read that statement of mine and assume that I wanted government to set those premiums on that basis. Absolutely I don't want government to set the premiums. I…

govinfo.gov
Mar 16, 1994

No, that's not government doing it, Rosa. It plans on offering it and people taking up the options to voluntarily lower their health care costs through their own wellness actions.

govinfo.gov
Mar 16, 1994

That's right. The uninsured rate, my colleague, is 8 percent. Connecticut's is 7.6 percent. For one-half of 1 percent why is it necessary to impose on the employers of Connecticut a mandate that you know will cost jobs in the short term…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation