First of all, there are no third-term abortions of healthy babies in America. It is illegal. But it is an absolutely horrendous insult to the women of America to think that we would carry an infant through pregnancy and arbitrarily and lightly choose to take that infant's life. It is not done. Women do not do it. As one who has carried children, four children full term and experienced both the joy and the pain of childbirth, I know of no woman who is not transformed by pregnancy and does not value that life she carries within her; and the implication that we do not is so offensive to me that I am astounded that my colleagues can get up here and present the image of women, for convenience sake, choosing a late-term abortion. There are no late-term abortions of healthy babies that are legal, and this bill does not ban late-term abortions. This bill attempts to ban a specific procedure, and it does it so clumsily that it does not differentiate between the constitutionally prescribed pre-viability and post-viability procedures and, therefore, tramples on the rights of women to make choices about the responsibilities they are going to take throughout their lives. We have in America the right to make that choice early in a pregnancy. We need that choice. We deserve that choice.
Nancy L. Johnson: “First of all, there are no third-term abortions of healthy babies in America. It is illegal. But it is an absolutely…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the implications of a bill related to late-term abortions.
Share
More from Nancy L. Johnson
on rollcall No. 79 I was inadvertently detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no.'' Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute No. 7 Offered by Mr. George Miller of California The Acting CHAIRMAN (Mr. Bass). The pending business…
As a representative from Georgia, not only has he been very effective here in this body of the House, but as a physician Member, he has been extremely effective. This is the first time we should have had a critical mass of physicians to…
does the gentleman feel confident even without any placeholder, should, say, the Senate fail to provide a placeholder, as they have in the past, that we will be able to address this in conference?
My legislation explicitly does not change HIPAA. The behavior described of hacking in and revealing what would be under HIPAA is a fine of $250,000 and 10 years in jail. So HIPAA is there. It protects our privacy. What this bill does is to…





