That is true, and one of the provisions in that legislation goes to the heart of what you were saying. It allowed seniors to report things they had been charged for wrongly and share in the savings. Remember they would have gotten half the cost of that delivery that the gentleman was billed for in savings, and the government would have gotten the other half of the savings. So it would have created, in a sense, an enforcement police the size of the entire senior population in America, and frankly that would have been a great thing.
Nancy L. Johnson: “That is true, and one of the provisions in that legislation goes to the heart of what you were saying. It allowed…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing legislation aimed at empowering seniors to report wrongful charges.
Share
More from Nancy L. Johnson
This legislation is nearly identical to H.R. 3146, a bill the House unanimously approved last week. The only change is the addition of a 6-month extension of expiring Medicare payment provisions affecting hospitals in small cities and…
We certainly are willing to accept the gentleman's amendment. It is a very thoughtful and important one.
But we need to do something better than the Senate position, and we certainly need to avoid the additional 2 percent cut that starts every year thereafter.
I claim time to say we accept the amendment. It is a very thoughtful amendment and an important one, and we thank the gentleman from New York (Mr. Towns).





