scare tactics have no place in this debate. There are no vouchers in this bill. In 2010, a senior that wants to be in the Medicare program will be in the Medicare program exactly as they are now. They will be in that Medicare program and have that choice of the Medicare program in 2010, in 2011, in 2012, in 2013. They will never receive a voucher. That word is not in this legislation. It is used rhetorically to scare seniors. I want to assure the seniors listening that this bill represents the most dramatic expansion of benefits under Medicare since the program was founded, not only prescription drugs but additional preventive benefits and a whole system to support seniors with chronic illness.
Nancy L. Johnson: “scare tactics have no place in this debate. There are no vouchers in this bill. In 2010, a senior that wants to be in…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about Medicare changes and benefits expansion during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Nancy L. Johnson
I thank you, but I thank you also for a very thoughtful bill in very tough times, truly one that does support safer communities and one that does help prepare our young people for a global environment. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the…
I claim time to say we accept the amendment. It is a very thoughtful amendment and an important one, and we thank the gentleman from New York (Mr. Towns).
I yield myself 40 seconds. Mr. Chairman, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle are acting as if we had technology that, if we only had the money, we could implement. That just isn't so. Secretary Levitt and Dr. Brailer have led a…
The gentlewoman from Oregon should know that with this prescription drug insurance plan Medicare recipients in Oregon who are covered will go from 60 percent up to 96.6 percent. This bill brings a benefit to Oregon.





