I rise today with concern about the reductions made in this legislation for Medicaid disproportionate share hospital [DSH] funding. The reductions made to DSH funding in this legislation will have a dramatic effect on Medicaid funding going to Connecticut, and 12 other States in similar situations: Alabama, Colorado, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. My home State of Connecticut is a high-DSH State, meaning that we have a number of low-income people who lack health insurance use Federal and State Medicaid funding to assist our hospitals that treat. Connecticut is acting responsibly by using available Federal funds to address the problem of people lacking health insurance. The DSH program is an integral part of Connecticut's overall Medicaid Program, involving over $400 million in combined Federal and State funding. The DSH formula in this legislation is unfair and disproportionately impacts a handful of states, including Connecticut, who have invested in DSH programs. These States are legitimately accessing funds through the Medicaid Program, which is designed to enhance the health care coverage of low-income people. We must recognize that DSH is not separate from Medicaid, but a critical component of providing quality health care to those who cannot otherwise afford it. During the fiscal year, Connecticut is receiving $204 million in DSH funding from the Federal Government.
Nancy L. Johnson: “I rise today with concern about the reductions made in this legislation for Medicaid disproportionate share hospital…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about reductions in Medicaid disproportionate share hospital funding during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Nancy L. Johnson
I recognize myself for 1\1/ 2\ minutes. I do find it really quite remarkable that my colleagues from the other side of the aisle, who spent literally months scaring seniors away from signing up for this benefit, claiming it was too…
remember, adoption of HIPAA was a multi-year process, very controversial, very difficult, 50,000 comments just on the regulations. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman will suspend. In debate on a motion to recommit, time is not…
we certainly are willing to accept the gentleman's amendment. It is a very thoughtful and important one.
I rise in support of H.R. 4227 and commend my colleague, the gentleman from Connecticut (Mr. Simmons), for introducing this legislation. This bill is simply about keeping promises, about keeping the promise made to the middle-class…





