As the Member of this House that introduced the first insurance reform bill, I know a good deal about pooling, and I can tell you that that pool is large enough so we can keep the low cost premiums of large pools, the low administrative costs and the low marketing costs. If you look at the legislation that I personally promoted as the lead sponsor, you will see that we reduced the cost of insurance through providing a good, solid plan developed by the private sector on the basis of the kind of average plan that Americans have come to consensus about, that they want, not by a Government defining benefits in and out, not saying you, mammogram now, not later. You can have this and not that. But letting the public choose from plans, some of which provide mammograms and some of which don't, because if you are young you don't need mammograms. If you are older, you certainly do. I don't want the Government controlling that.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing insurance reform and the role of government in defining health benefits.
Share
More from Nancy L. Johnson
And working together, it is my recollection this company is now providing the same comprehensive benefits to their employees as their competitors but at a savings of at least 20 percent in spite of the fact that they have built this…
I firmly believe that this Congress has the ability and the will to put on the President's desk a bill that will prohibit insurers from excluding people for preexisting conditions. That is a proposal that I introduced in 1991. My Democrat…
That's right. The uninsured rate, my colleague, is 8 percent. Connecticut's is 7.6 percent. For one-half of 1 percent why is it necessary to impose on the employers of Connecticut a mandate that you know will cost jobs in the short term…
How would I improve Medicare? I would improve Medicare by allowing all Medicare patients in all States, not just 15, to have access to the Medicare Program that is a managed care program, and for the same premium gives you prescription…





