I want to ask just one question to the gentleman, as a physician. Is it not true that under our emergency services section, where we guarantee people the right, if one's pain is severe enough that any prudent layperson would think someone needed to go to the emergency room, they can go to the emergency room and get care under our bill and under the other bill? But there is a unique aspect to our bill. That has to do with very, very young infants, where of course 'the prudent layperson' rule is a little hard to apply. So we do take a different tack in that portion of the bill. If the gentleman would just talk about that, I think it would help people understand how thoughtful our legislation is.
Nancy L. Johnson: “I want to ask just one question to the gentleman, as a physician. Is it not true that under our emergency services…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the emergency services section of a healthcare bill.
Share
More from Nancy L. Johnson
I do not consider the AARP a special interest group, or the Coalition to Ensure Patient Access a special interest group, or the Alzheimer's Association a special interest group, or the Kidney Cancer Association a special interest group.
This legislation is nearly identical to H.R. 3146, a bill the House unanimously approved last week. The only change is the addition of a 6-month extension of expiring Medicare payment provisions affecting hospitals in small cities and…
I also want to say both to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Regula) and also to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Obey) that you have brought forward for this body a very fine, balanced bill in a difficult era. The money that you have put into…
But we need to do something better than the Senate position, and we certainly need to avoid the additional 2 percent cut that starts every year thereafter.





