Mr. Speaker, the reality is that clinic violence has risen dramatically in the past year, with fully half of clinics participating in the recent survey experiencing severe antiabortion violence. Virtually all of these clinics participating in the survey provide services that are important to women, and often are the only providers available to women without insurance. They provide birth control services, prenatal care services, menopausal treatment services, to name only a few. In order for this legislation to be invoked, there must be violence, threat of violence, or physical obstruction. Antiabortion activists who are lawfully exercising their first-amendment right to demonstrate peacefully will not be penalized by this legislation. The Supreme Court has upheld a woman's right until the point of fetal viability to have an abortion. That is her legal right. To physically dissent from this decision made by the Court by blockading a building, by preventing a woman from exercising her legal right to access to a legal medical procedure, is a violation of the law, pure and simple. My right to swing my arm ends at your nose. Democracy rests on a foundation of liberty and tolerance and respect and matters of conscience are sometimes hard as the abortion issue demonstrates, but differences honestly held, though deeply in conflict, cannot be resolved by denying the rights of others.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the rise in clinic violence and the legal rights surrounding abortion access.
Share
More from Nancy L. Johnson
if an employer mandate were enacted, my State would lose 14,300 jobs. As we debate yet another mandate on America's employers, let us not forget the real world implications of such mandates. I challenge each of my colleagues to find one…
tonight I will be holding a special order on the economic implications of an employer mandate in health care reform. I believe this is one of the most critical issues involved in the health care reform debate. For that reason, I along with…
Listen to this. In the community health center, they pay according to a sliding scale. For the insurance they would pay on their own, unless they were low income, and then they have vouchers to help subsidize the cost. So we provide…
When the government says ``This is the package and you will pay a percent of payroll for this package,'' then the employer is in a very different situation than he is today. For example, in Connecticut we have been through very hard times…





