the points the gentleman makes are very good. Not only will the mandate cost jobs, because it will not be worth paying benefits for either low-wage positions, and certainly many part-time positions, but others will lose wages, because more will have to go into benefits, and that $28 billion figure that represents people who will not lose their jobs, they will just lose wages, they will lose buying power, because more of their ``wages'' will go into the higher cost benefits that government will mandate. The other point that the gentleman made that was very important for people to understand is that this is not building on the current system.
Nancy L. Johnson: “the points the gentleman makes are very good. Not only will the mandate cost jobs, because it will not be worth paying…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the economic impact of government mandates on jobs and wages.
Share
More from Nancy L. Johnson
42 million seniors can now sign up for the new voluntary Medicare drug benefit. Yesterday I was with a senior in my district, Shirley Rabinowitz, who takes 17 different prescription drugs. Let me say that again: 17 different prescription…
I claim time to say we accept the amendment. It is a very thoughtful amendment and an important one, and we thank the gentleman from New York (Mr. Towns).
I was an early and fervent supporter of providing health benefits to families on welfare as they made the difficult transition to work, often to entry-level jobs not providing basic care for their children. So I appreciate the need for…
this is how we answer that little girl. We tell her the world that she is going to work in is going to be a world in which there will be better labor laws better enforced. For the very first time ever, the International Labor Organization…





