I absolutely do. I think we are facing the possibility of physicians fleeing the Medicare program and creating a real access problem for seniors to physicians of their choice. But acceding to the Senate position is not going to fix it; it is going to exacerbate it. We need a better fix than the Senate offers. We need one without the threat of a 6 percent cut in the year after that which is absolutely unconscionable. So the negotiations are about finding better solutions. And that is one area in which we need a better solution, but if you cannot negotiate, if you do not have the latitude, you cannot get to the right answer. And this resolution tells you what the right answer is, when it is not the right answer and abandons the opportunity to negotiate in a number of areas.
Nancy L. Johnson: “I absolutely do. I think we are facing the possibility of physicians fleeing the Medicare program and creating a real…”
Share
More from Nancy L. Johnson
This legislation is nearly identical to H.R. 3146, a bill the House unanimously approved last week. The only change is the addition of a 6-month extension of expiring Medicare payment provisions affecting hospitals in small cities and…
Does the gentleman feel confident even without any placeholder, should, say, the Senate fail to provide a placeholder, as they have in the past, that we will be able to address this in conference?
The gentlewoman from Oregon should know that with this prescription drug insurance plan Medicare recipients in Oregon who are covered will go from 60 percent up to 96.6 percent. This bill brings a benefit to Oregon.
But we need to do something better than the Senate position, and we certainly need to avoid the additional 2 percent cut that starts every year thereafter.





