You bet, you bet. It would have been good for the seniors, good for the program, good for the government because it would have created the right partnership between the government, the seniors of America and the providers of health care in our country who are without doubt the best. But I also want to point to a couple of other things that were in our bill last year because some of them actually the Congress passed and the public did not have a chance to understand that, one of the provisions in the medicare formula.
Nancy L. Johnson: “You bet, you bet. It would have been good for the seniors, good for the program, good for the government because it…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the benefits of a healthcare bill for seniors and the government.
Share
More from Nancy L. Johnson
I recognize myself for 1\1/ 2\ minutes. I do find it really quite remarkable that my colleagues from the other side of the aisle, who spent literally months scaring seniors away from signing up for this benefit, claiming it was too…
I would be happy to respond. Actuaries estimate things differently. The CMS actuaries estimate that 1.1 million won't sign up if we move the deadline. In other words, they will lose the pressure they have today to sign up by May 15 and the…
we certainly are willing to accept the gentleman's amendment. It is a very thoughtful and important one.
remember, adoption of HIPAA was a multi-year process, very controversial, very difficult, 50,000 comments just on the regulations. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman will suspend. In debate on a motion to recommit, time is not…





