The Senator from Arizona is quite right. He remembers the numbers exactly. It was a 90-to-8 vote--very strong bipartisan support for this idea. That support ought not be frustrated. I have seen public opinion surveys that say it represents the desire and opinion, quite naturally, not just of the families of September 11 victims but of the American people. So while I join my friend from Arizona in expressing my gratitude that the White House has again today restarted negotiations to try to reach an agreement, I must say leaving this proposal for a commission out of this substitute that is now put in to create a Department of Homeland Security is inexplicable. I hope we can explain it by either putting it back in or coming to an agreement with the White House. It is that critical.
Joe Lieberman: “The Senator from Arizona is quite right. He remembers the numbers exactly. It was a 90-to-8 vote--very strong bipartisan…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a commission in the context of creating a Department of Homeland Security.
Share
More from Joe Lieberman
You may choose to look the other way, but you can never again say you did not know.
We got into this because our members about a year-and-a-half ago said to us, oh, my God, another Trump-Biden match. It's not good for the country. It offers no hope of bringing bipartisanship back to Washington regardless of who wins.
It has mattered to me because there are two great American constitutional principles that are at the heart of the cause of D.C. statehood and that are violated every day in the current treatment of residents of the District of Columbia.
Its not only a weak basis for judgment, it is unacceptable in our system of law and equity.





