I am very privileged to be a cosponsor with the Senator from Iowa of this amendment, and I congratulate him on his willingness to charge the fortress here, to try to remove one of the hurdles to this being a truly representative and productive body. The filibuster may have made some sense at one point; it may have been a reasonable idea, but it in fact has been badly misused in our time. You can pick your favorite statistic, but the one that I saw a while ago was that there were more filibusters in the last session of the Senate than in the first 108 years combined. Others will tell you there have been more since 1990 than the preceding 140 years combined. Whatever the years, it is pretty obvious we have come to a point in the history of this Chamber where the filibuster, the ability of one Member to stand up and stop the body from functioning effectively and to block the will of the majority, is a contributor to gridlock and to our inability to produce and, therefore, to public frustration which is in the air and we are attempting as best we can to respond to them.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the misuse of the filibuster and its impact on Senate productivity.
Share
More from Joe Lieberman
Perhaps you saw over the weekend in the Washington Post there was an article about the evidence that the North Koreans, Kim Jong-un has an active pathogen development program.
I hope you Members of the Committee in this session will similarly rise to the challenge of this moment and this problem and work together to get something good and great done for our country.
I think this is a unique moment in history, where the American people are so fed up with the two parties and the two logical probable candidates that they're going to welcome a bipartisan unity third choice on the ballot.
Taxation without representation became the rallying cry that led to our Declaration of Independence and a war to achieve it.





