I support this involvement, I support the command overseeing it, and I support the soldiers in the field, I don't want to set a date down for this kind of vote on our involvement in Bosnia. For those who are against it, they always have the option to try to eliminate funding for it through the appropriations process. I think to state a date by which we are going to vote next year on whether to remain involved in Bosnia or not hangs a sword of uncertainty in this case over the entire operation, over the American troops that are there, over our NATO allies who have said they will leave when we leave: 'We went in together, we are going out together.' That is what I have heard them say over and over again. Again, it raises the prospect in the minds and hearts of those who are waiting to resume this conflict that they may well have the opportunity come next spring, because the U.S. Senate may vote to terminate this involvement.
Joe Lieberman: “I support this involvement, I support the command overseeing it, and I support the soldiers in the field, I don't want…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing U.S. involvement in Bosnia and the implications of a potential vote on funding.
Share
More from Joe Lieberman
No right is more precious in a free country than that of having a voice in the election of those who make the laws under which we must live.
We got into this because our members about a year-and-a-half ago said to us, oh, my God, another Trump-Biden match. It's not good for the country. It offers no hope of bringing bipartisanship back to Washington regardless of who wins.
That is just--you cannot do that because they have got to report early, and that is the way to stop it and really secure the agricultural sector of our economy.
Its not only a weak basis for judgment, it is unacceptable in our system of law and equity.





