There has been discussion whether it is appropriate at this time, and whether this would be viewed by some as undercutting the position or weakening the position of the President and the Secretary of State in their efforts to obtain peace in the Middle East. Those concerns are legitimate. We are not entirely totally comfortable moving forward with this amendment. We ought to return to our constitutional responsibilities as a coequal branch of government. No one denies that there is a crisis in the Middle East today, that there is the possibility of a wider conflict. There is no doubt that you can draw many scenarios in which the national security interests of the United States are threatened. If we accept those premises I articulated, then there does come a time when the Congress of the United States, as a coequal branch of government, exercising particularly in the Senate our responsibilities of advise and consent, should speak out.
Joe Lieberman: “There has been discussion whether it is appropriate at this time, and whether this would be viewed by some as…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the role of Congress in relation to the President's efforts for peace in the Middle East.
Share
More from Joe Lieberman
I think this is a unique moment in history, where the American people are so fed up with the two parties and the two logical probable candidates that they're going to welcome a bipartisan unity third choice on the ballot.
I think the reality of this threat to agricultural security has quite naturally now hit the people in the industry more than people outside.
That is just--you cannot do that because they have got to report early, and that is the way to stop it and really secure the agricultural sector of our economy.
next year will be the 100th anniversary of the influenza outbreak of 1918. They estimate that at least 50 million and maybe as many as 100 million people died from that flu in 1 year globally.





