the Levin amendment would take an important step forward in eliminating unfair advantages to the private sector that may result from this legislation. I urge adoption of the amendment. Exhibit 1 International Association of Environmental Testing Laboratories, Alexandia, VA, January 19, 1995. Hon. Joseph I. Lieberman, U.S. Senate, Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, DC. Dear Senator Lieberman: The International Association of Environmental Testing Laboratories (IAETL) is writing to support the Kerry, Levin, Lieberman proposed amendment to Senate Hill No. 1 concerning unfunded mandates. As a trade association representing two-thirds of the environmental testing industry, IAETL supports your proposed amendment concerning the even-handed application of environmental laws to apply to both the public and private sectors. S. 1 as currently written threatens public health and the environment and disadvantages commercial environmental testing laboratories that provides the same services as government laboratories. Environmental laboratories provide critical analysis of soil, air, and water for toxic contaminants. Such analysis is the basis for important public health and environmental decisions. IAETL believes that public health and the environment are threatened by exempting government laboratories from standards designed to ensure the quality and reliability of laboratory data.
Joe Lieberman: “the Levin amendment would take an important step forward in eliminating unfair advantages to the private sector that may…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Levin amendment related to environmental testing and unfunded mandates.
Share
More from Joe Lieberman
Basically, Al Gore put the interests of the country first. President Trump on the other hand lost the election by over 7 million votes. He contested in court more than 50 times, lost them all. And still he refuses to give up. And I think…
The claim that President Trump had no authority to order this attack without constitutional approval is constitutionally untenable and practically senseless.
We could pass a health care reform bill this week with more than 60 votes, and it would be bipartisan, if he just took a few things out of the bill.
It is self-evidently unacceptable in America to condition the enjoyment of constitutional rights on political party membership.





