We both felt that this was a case where the balance of public interest and safety was in putting this information out, not everything, but that there had been a specific, credible, unconfirmed threat.
Joe Lieberman: “We both felt that this was a case where the balance of public interest and safety was in putting this information out…”
Editor's note · Context
Lieberman emphasizes the need to balance public interest and safety regarding threat information.
Share
More from Joe Lieberman
Basically, Al Gore put the interests of the country first. President Trump on the other hand lost the election by over 7 million votes. He contested in court more than 50 times, lost them all. And still he refuses to give up. And I think…
We got into this because our members about a year-and-a-half ago said to us, oh, my God, another Trump-Biden match. It's not good for the country. It offers no hope of bringing bipartisanship back to Washington regardless of who wins.
You may choose to look the other way, but you can never again say you did not know.
I think this is a unique moment in history, where the American people are so fed up with the two parties and the two logical probable candidates that they're going to welcome a bipartisan unity third choice on the ballot.





