I thank my friend. So I take his answer to say also--correct me if I am wrong--that the existing statute, including the MCA--which is the subject of the lawsuits we have been describing that are pending--the existing statute does not alter the right of American citizens who are alleged to be enemy combatants to use habeas corpus rights?
Joe Lieberman: “I thank my friend. So I take his answer to say also--correct me if I am wrong--that the existing statute, including the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Military Commissions Act on habeas corpus rights for American citizens.
Share
More from Joe Lieberman
It has mattered to me because there are two great American constitutional principles that are at the heart of the cause of D.C. statehood and that are violated every day in the current treatment of residents of the District of Columbia.
That is just--you cannot do that because they have got to report early, and that is the way to stop it and really secure the agricultural sector of our economy.
Part of the problem there has been--and this goes to early warning and intelligence--how do you stop an outbreak, of either a bioterrorist attack or naturally occurring, from spreading.
If Congress were to formally authorize something that exists now, the National Veterinary Stockpile, that would send a strong message that this is a necessary national asset.





