Right. But only, if I understand it, to protect the authority of the departments except as we specifically alter them in the bill. So, for instance, the national intelligence director will have certain budget authorities or transfer authorities under the bill, as it exists, which do alter the authority of some of those constituent departments--State, Energy, Homeland Security, Defense, et cetera. I would not want this language to obviate the impact of all of those changes.
Joe Lieberman: “Right. But only, if I understand it, to protect the authority of the departments except as we specifically alter them in…”
On the recordOctober 1, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the authority of departments in relation to a bill on national intelligence.
Share
More from Joe Lieberman
Mar 5, 2024
We got into this because our members about a year-and-a-half ago said to us, oh, my God, another Trump-Biden match. It's not good for the country. It offers no hope of bringing bipartisanship back to Washington regardless of who wins.
Jan 13, 2020
The claim that President Trump had no authority to order this attack without constitutional approval is constitutionally untenable and practically senseless.
Dec 12, 2017
Perhaps you saw over the weekend in the Washington Post there was an article about the evidence that the North Koreans, Kim Jong-un has an active pathogen development program.





