I will speak on the substitute on homeland security introduced yesterday by Senator Thompson on behalf of Senators Gramm and Miller. My feelings about this substitute, to put it as directly as I can, are mixed. The substitute would create a single strong Department of Homeland Security under the leadership of an accountable Secretary, which many Members have supported, actually, for more than a year now in response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the dangerous vulnerabilities in our federal homeland security system that those attacks revealed. The substitute is also problematic in many ways. I categorize them in four chunks. First, this substitute contains several provisions that are just ill-conceived, missed opportunities to close vulnerabilities in our security or that otherwise make the wrong choice. Second, the bill contains provisions that are unrelated to homeland security legislation. Apparently, as often happens in Congress, some of our colleagues have decided to put the provisions on what they assumed was the last bus out of town during this session rather than waiting for the right ride. Third, the bill contains provisions that do seem, as we approach December, to be gift wrapped by lobbyists to satisfy some special interests, not carefully considered to improve the security of the American people.
Joe Lieberman: “I will speak on the substitute on homeland security introduced yesterday by Senator Thompson on behalf of Senators Gramm…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the homeland security substitute bill during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Joe Lieberman
The more than 700,000 citizens of the District of Columbia are our neighbors. They deserve to be treated as such by the rest of us in this country.
Perhaps you saw over the weekend in the Washington Post there was an article about the evidence that the North Koreans, Kim Jong-un has an active pathogen development program.
Democrats should leave partisan politics at the water's edge and stand together against Iran and dangerous leaders like Soleimani.
It has mattered to me because there are two great American constitutional principles that are at the heart of the cause of D.C. statehood and that are violated every day in the current treatment of residents of the District of Columbia.





