What we need, and the guarantee that we have provided every American through Social Security, is, as the gentlewoman pointed out, a safety net, a floor from which they cannot fall through. And, as the gentlewoman pointed out, our pension systems are already overstressed. We have gone from defined benefit to defined contribution to companies pulling out, wholesale, from providing benefits, to people's personal savings where, again, the gentlewoman points out the difficulty that people have, the lack of incentives that are there for them to save. So the question that a lot of the people at my forums ask is why would we introduce an element of risk in the only guarantee that we have on that three-legged stool that prevents us from falling through the floor and into the depths of poverty, which for a woman in this country is so vitally important.
John Larson: “What we need, and the guarantee that we have provided every American through Social Security, is, as the gentlewoman…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of Social Security as a safety net during a debate on pension systems.
Share
More from John Larson
I rise this morning because Democrats have introduced a resolution of inquiry to get the information from the whistleblower who has talked about what happened to the more than 300 million Americans who depend on Social Security. This…
Take everyone out of it and say to the public, you have three people who have never served and one person who will be a full chair of a committee that’s dealing with an issue that’s going to impact all 330 million Americans.
The administration’s claim that recent developments constitute a new conflict and restart what they consider to be a 60-day deadline under the War Powers Resolution is nothing more than a legally baseless attempt to evade Congress and…





