Not only is it true, but I think what the general public needs to understand, and as you point out, Mr. Cartwright, the saying goes like this: Well, people are living longer, so, therefore, because they are living longer, what we ought to do is raise the age. What the study committee doesn't tell you is that for every year you raise the age, that is a 7 percent cut in benefits. Oh, so if you raise the age to 70, that is a 21 percent cut in your benefits going forward. How is it, from just mere logic, that if you are living longer you need to live on 21 percent less? The American people understand this, and that is why they are so upset, but that is why, Mr. Cartwright, we need a vote. {time} 1945
Share & report
More from John Larson
I start by echoing the sentiments that both the chairman and the ranking member had about Jackie Walorski and how deeply we all feel for her and her family and the staff members who were lost. I congratulate Mr. Neal and also members of…
I am here this morning to talk about Social Security. I start with commending Chairman Neal of the Ways and Means Committee, and especially for his formation of the Racial Equity Committee that was headed up by one of the previous…
First I would appeal to your great instincts and patience and thank you for this hour, but we actually have colleagues, at least four, that are here. Over 30 showed up. Would it be possible to yield them a minute apiece? I would make a…
I thank the gentlewoman from Massachusetts. I yield to the gentleman from Connecticut (Mr. Courtney). Together, we have gone across the State of Connecticut as we have talked about Social Security and its importance and significance…





