I appreciate that clarification.
Editor's note · Context
Courtney acknowledges clarification regarding federal contracting obligations.
Share
More from Joe Courtney
this is incredibly problematic and entirely unjustifiable. Put simply, there is no reason for Congress to actively remove these protections for those fighters who choose to sign with the UBO, and there is no reason for a UBO to be exempt…
the reason, and as a former employer, is that if Congress made that move, it basically would add to the taxable income of all the employees
You’d basically have to tear the plane down to the studs and rebuild it to meet all the survivability, security and communications requirements of Air Force One.
in 2025, with growing global maritime threats, it is particularly important for Congress to exercise its constitutional mandate to ``provide and maintain a Navy.'' The Seapower portion of this bill accomplished that goal. For example, the…





