Political Quotes

On the recordJanuary 17, 2019
I very much appreciate the advocacy of Chairwoman Waters, but this is fundamentally not a partisan issue, and I appreciate the ranking member making the point. This is a reputational issue, and I want everyone in the Chamber to understand that this is about the reputation of the United States, about the Congress, about the Treasury, and about each individual Member who votes today. This is a complicated deal. I have spent hours understanding this deal. But there is a big question that every Member ought to ask themselves: Is this the moment to relax sanctions on a Russian company; on a Russian oligarch? Is this the moment to sign off on a deal that allows an oligarch to hand his shares to a Russian bank, which is also sanctioned and controlled by the Russian Government? At the end of this deal, if this deal goes through, Mr. Deripaska will continue to own and vote 35 percent of the shares of this company. Mr. Speaker, you can control the company with 35 percent of the shares. But an additional 28 percent of those shares will be owned and controlled by affiliates of Mr. Deripaska. Now, Treasury says that doesn't matter because there will be somebody independently voting those shares. I have asked three times now, and Treasury has not told me who those people are. So what is the rush? There is no problem in the aluminum markets today. The price of aluminum today is lower than it was before this company was listed. This is reputational.…
Said by
Jim Himes
Democratic · Connecticut
Source
govinfo.gov
Jan 17, 2019

Share

More from Jim Himes

Jun 8, 2026

You just could not have come up with worse timing for what is probably the worst appointment into the intelligence community that I've ever seen.

cbsnews.com
Jul 19, 2026

Russia’s core objective here is to create chaos.

huffpost.com
Jul 19, 2026

What is devastating is that a United States senator, and maybe more than one United States senator, would effectively tee up a coup d’état, right?

huffpost.com
Jul 17, 2026

There is zero proof that using mail-in ballots has led to a corruption of an election.

ctmirror.org

Other voices in this conversation