I just want to explain to the gentleman that it has been against the law since 1907 for corporate treasury money to be used in campaigns and since 1947 for union dues money to be used in campaigns. The way they do it, the way they go after you, either corporations or unions, is through soft money, because it is not called campaign money, and sham issue ads, because it is not called campaign money. We abolish both. That is the basis, the very center of our bill. The gentleman wants to give unions permission in their union dues to do it if they agree; we do not even allow it. It has been against the law since 1947. And so, sir, it would be an impossibility for those advertisements to run against the gentleman if our legislation passed, and that is why I am so dumbfounded why the gentleman would oppose it.
Christopher Shays: “I just want to explain to the gentleman that it has been against the law since 1907 for corporate treasury money to be…”
On the recordSeptember 14, 1999
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing campaign finance laws and the implications of proposed legislation.
Share
More from Christopher Shays
Apr 24, 2008
This industry may be highly regulated by State, Federal and international governments, but because all are involved, no one takes ownership. I had an experience with a constituent, George Smith, who was lost at sea on his honeymoon on…
Sep 9, 2013
We sent a message years ago when we turned our back on the Shah of Iran, for whatever reason.
Sep 9, 2013
The conclusion by the President and his administration and leaders on both sides of the aisle that the United States needs to take decisive military action with or without support from other countries would be a serious mistake with…





