in our rush to ban human reproductive cloning, we are at risk of also banning the most promising and exciting area of biomedical research in the past thirty years. If passed into law, the overly-broad Human Cloning Prohibition Act would ban not only human cloning but also a laboratory technique that may enable scientists to understand the genetic causes of diseases such as cancer and develop therapies for diseases and disabilities such as diabetes, Parkinson's Disease, and spinal cord injuries. No responsible person, patient advocate or scientist supports the cloning of human beings. Human reproductive cloning is unethical, should be prohibited, and should be punishable under federal law. But in banning human cloning, we should not ban a laboratory technique called somatic cell nuclear transfer, which can be used to derive human embryonic stem cells. With such stem cells, our scientists will gain fundamental insights into cell biology that will lead to new treatments and cures for a host of diseases and disabilities. Prohibiting this basic scientific technique will severely hinder U.S. research. Our scientists have achieved an unparalleled record of accomplishment by employing new technologies to benefit humankind. New innovations in scientific discovery have historically been controversial, but they have proven to save lives and help manage devastating diseases.
Christopher Shays: “in our rush to ban human reproductive cloning, we are at risk of also banning the most promising and exciting area of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Human Cloning Prohibition Act on biomedical research.
Share
More from Christopher Shays
Rather than focusing on destroying elements of the Syrian government forces and choosing sides in a truly brutal civil war, our focus should be on how do we get these chemical weapons out of Syria.
And if I could just jump in. The key that you make is that there are 8 million individuals, either actively working for the government or retired, who are part of the same pool, and so the purchasing power becomes more powerful.
First, let me say if the President really believed that a military strike would have been effective, he would have done it right away.
When I hear how partisan some of my colleagues have gotten on the other side of the aisle, it really astonishes me that somehow it is the President's fault. The clear fact is that we had better find a way to work together, because in my…





