Political Quotes

Christopher Shays: I voted against H.R. 2028, the Pledge Protection Act. The phrase ``under God'' belongs in our Pledge of Allegiance to…

On the recordSeptember 23, 2004
I voted against H.R. 2028, the Pledge Protection Act. The phrase ``under God'' belongs in our Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and the words ``In God We Trust'' belong on our currency. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals made a serious error in Newdow v. U.S. Congress when they declared our Pledge unconstitutional. When the phrase ``under God'' was added to the Pledge of Allegiance in 1954, I was in elementary school and remember feeling the phrase belonged there. It appropriately reflects the fact that a belief in God motivated the founding and development of our great Nation. The Declaration of Independence states, ``We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights . . .'' Our forefathers understood it was not they, but He, who had bestowed upon all of us those most cherished rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness upon which our model of government is based. At Gettysburg, President Abraham Lincoln acknowledged we were a Nation under God and, during his Second Inaugural Address, he mentioned our Creator 13 times. Those historic speeches, the Pledge of Allegiance, our currency and the Declaration of Independence are not prayers or parts of a religious service. They are a statement of our commitment as citizens to our great Nation and the role God plays in it.
Said by
Christopher Shays
Connecticut

Editor's note · Context

Opposing the Pledge Protection Act and defending the inclusion of 'under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Share

More from Christopher Shays

Sep 9, 2013

We have proven we can do it in the elimination of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.

congress.gov
Sep 9, 2013

What should be our primary concern, that chemical weapons were used by the Syrian Army, or that Syria has chemical weapons that could fall into the hands of radical elements sympathetic to al-Qaeda and other terrorist organizations?

congress.gov
Apr 22, 2008

Right. Because what we do is we cap the payroll at $120,000. And so it ends up being $12,000 an employer would pay. But when I was speaking of someone with 500 employees, they would pay $21,000 salary, they pay 5.25, 5¼ percent of payroll…

govinfo.gov
Sep 9, 2013

A military strike will do nothing to address that issue, and would exacerbate it by accelerating the transfer of chemical weapons to people who would do us harm.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation