I rise in support of H.R. 1950, the Foreign Relations Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 2004 and 2005. In particularly, I would like to comment on Section 273: Staffing at Diplomatic Missions. As Chairman of the Committee on Government Reform's Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations, I have held several hearings on rightsizing the U.S. presence overseas. Rightsizing the U.S. presence overseas is the process of putting the right people with the right skills in the right places. It is first and foremost about keeping U.S. personnel safe, but it is also about successfully manning the diplomatic front in the war against terrorism. Under-skilled personnel running visa lines in sensitive countries, personnel handling communications without necessary language skills, or a lack of staff to handle workloads hurt diplomatic readiness and a key part of the war on terrorism: our nation's relationships with its allies. Moreover, rightsizing involves every government agency with a presence overseas, not simply the Department of State.
Christopher Shays: “I rise in support of H.R. 1950, the Foreign Relations Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 2004 and 2005. In particularly…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of staffing at diplomatic missions in relation to national security and foreign relations.
Share
More from Christopher Shays
First, let me say if the President really believed that a military strike would have been effective, he would have done it right away.
We need to engage the world community, particularly Russia, to persuade Assad to give up his chemical weapons.
When I hear how partisan some of my colleagues have gotten on the other side of the aisle, it really astonishes me that somehow it is the President's fault. The clear fact is that we had better find a way to work together, because in my…
I am concerned it will inflame the region and retaliate not only Iran and Hezbollah against Israel but at the same time embolden and empower these rebel forces.





