But the bottom line, if the gentleman will further yield, is that we literally have more protections to the potential terrorists than we do for someone involved in organized crime. We make it more difficult, not easier, to get that information. And yet the stakes are so high. I was in your State at Los Alamos. Is that actually in your district or your neighbor's?
Discussing the balance of protections for potential terrorists versus organized crime during a debate.
Share
More from Christopher Shays
He is our President, and we need to help him gain some status and support in his efforts to negotiate with countries around the world.
We have proven we can do it in the elimination of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.
We sent a message years ago when we turned our back on the Shah of Iran, for whatever reason.
I believed there were weapons of mass destruction, wrong, shouldn't have done it.
Other voices in this conversation
