I rise in strong opposition, not to recognition of any tribe necessarily, but to recognition of a tribe through a legislative process rather than through the Bureau of Indian Affairs. The fact is that this bill, as it is titled, is to reaffirm and clarify the Federal relationship with the Burt Lake Band as a distinctly recognized Indian tribe and for other purposes. What we are trying to do is circumvent a process of petition before the Bureau of Indian Affairs, while the Bureau of Indian Affairs is trying to determine that while you were once a tribe, does this group of people still constitute a tribe today. That is a process that is in the works today. As the Bureau of Indian Affairs has stated, they expect to know within 6 months whether or not they can recommend that this tribe should be Federally recognized. Please know that when we recognize a tribe, we are giving them a status as an independent nation, notwithstanding the other benefit that they can establish a gaming institution.
Christopher Shays: “I rise in strong opposition, not to recognition of any tribe necessarily, but to recognition of a tribe through a…”
On the recordNovember 4, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing a bill for the recognition of the Burt Lake Band as a federally recognized tribe.
Share
More from Christopher Shays
May 22, 2008
It's kind of a mouthful to hear this is a bipartisan bill when 42 amendments go to Democrats and 14 go to Republicans. That's one Republican amendment for every three Democratic amendments. But it's a bipartisan bill? It's kind of amazing…
Sep 9, 2013
A military strike will do nothing to address that issue, and would exacerbate it by accelerating the transfer of chemical weapons to people who would do us harm.
Sep 17, 2008
When a candidate attacks the other candidate for being sleazy and ugly, they are as negative as the candidate that they are criticizing.





