Trade promotion authority enhances the United States' ability to negotiate agreements that help American workers and businesses. Just as we can't repeal the laws of gravity, we can't ignore the fact that we live in a world with a global economy. It is estimated if global trade barriers could be cut by just one-third, the world economy would grow more than $600 billion each year. Talk about economic stimulus--this is it! Trade promotion authority will open new markets. Without this authority, trading partners will not put forth meaningful offers. Tariffs on American products won't be reduced, and our economy will grow at a much slower rate. Passing this bill signals to the world we are committed to global trade and free markets. It allows the United States to take a leadership role in building international trading systems based on American principles of market-based economics and fair play. Giving the President the authority to negotiate trade agreements is good for Connecticut, the United States and every country involved. Exports accounted for almost one quarter of all U.S. economic growth in the last 10 years. Trade promotion authority should pass without delay.
Christopher Shays: “Trade promotion authority enhances the United States' ability to negotiate agreements that help American workers and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of trade promotion authority for the U.S. economy.
Share
More from Christopher Shays
And if I could just jump in. The key that you make is that there are 8 million individuals, either actively working for the government or retired, who are part of the same pool, and so the purchasing power becomes more powerful.
This industry may be highly regulated by State, Federal and international governments, but because all are involved, no one takes ownership. I had an experience with a constituent, George Smith, who was lost at sea on his honeymoon on…
What should be our primary concern, that chemical weapons were used by the Syrian Army, or that Syria has chemical weapons that could fall into the hands of radical elements sympathetic to al-Qaeda and other terrorist organizations?
Sadly, I believe these strikes will have no serious military consequences on Assad because he can win this war without using chemical weapons.





