There is money for brownfields in this legislation. I am just adding 10 percent more. But let's take my amendment out of the equation and at least have this dialogue about brownfields for my edification and for the Record. Is it your point that you are appropriating this $10 million in this budget that you have, but that you do not anticipate it will be spent?
Discussing funding for brownfields during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Christopher Shays
This industry may be highly regulated by State, Federal and international governments, but because all are involved, no one takes ownership. I had an experience with a constituent, George Smith, who was lost at sea on his honeymoon on…
It's kind of a mouthful to hear this is a bipartisan bill when 42 amendments go to Democrats and 14 go to Republicans. That's one Republican amendment for every three Democratic amendments. But it's a bipartisan bill? It's kind of amazing…
Sadly, I believe these strikes will have no serious military consequences on Assad because he can win this war without using chemical weapons.
Rather than focusing on destroying elements of the Syrian government forces and choosing sides in a truly brutal civil war, our focus should be on how do we get these chemical weapons out of Syria.
Other voices in this conversation
