And the Beck decision was this: it was a decision that if you were not a member of a union, you did not have to have your money go for political purposes. It was not a decision that said if you were a member of a union that you did not have your money go. You had to leave the union, and then your money did not go for political purposes.
Discussing the implications of the Beck decision regarding union membership and political funding.
Share
More from Christopher Shays
We sent a message years ago when we turned our back on the Shah of Iran, for whatever reason.
He is our President, and we need to help him gain some status and support in his efforts to negotiate with countries around the world.
We have proven we can do it in the elimination of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.
Other voices in this conversation
