I recognize the budgetary constraints under which Chairman Walsh is working, and commend him for doing an admirable job under difficult circumstances. I am, however, deeply concerned about several programs reduced or eliminated in this bill. This legislation fails to fund EPA's Office of Long Island Sound Programs. On May 9, the House voted 391 to 29 to reauthorize the program at an $80 million level. Over the past decade, the Long Island Sound Office has been an essential partner with Connecticut and New York. Together we have made enormous progress in the cleanup of Long Island Sound. But, we still have much work to do and many challenges to face. It is critical the Long Island Sound Office funding be restored and increased significantly so we may succeed in cleaning up, preserving and protecting Long Island Sound for future generations. This bill also eliminates additional Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funding for disaster relief--providing only $300 million, a decrease of $2.4 billion from FY 00. It is fiscally irresponsible for this House to neglect to appropriate money for disaster relief. Natural disasters cannot be prevented, and the federal government has a responsibility to assist communities respond to emergencies. Relying on emergency spending appropriations bills to respond to inevitable disasters is simply not good budgeting.
Christopher Shays: “I recognize the budgetary constraints under which Chairman Walsh is working, and commend him for doing an admirable job…”
On the recordJune 21, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about budget cuts to environmental and disaster relief programs.
Share
More from Christopher Shays
Jun 26, 2008
I rise today to support to H.R. 6377, the Energy Markets Emergency Act, because I believe the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, CFTC, must investigate speculation in the energy futures market and account for any manipulation and price…
Sep 9, 2013
What are we hoping to achieve in Syria, and why do we think doing what we are planning on doing will give us the results we want?
Apr 22, 2008
Right. Because what we do is we cap the payroll at $120,000. And so it ends up being $12,000 an employer would pay. But when I was speaking of someone with 500 employees, they would pay $21,000 salary, they pay 5.25, 5¼ percent of payroll…





