As my colleague knows, I happen to be supportive of trying to get to his amendment, trying to negotiate so we can get his amendment up at this point. There are also other amendments we might be able to clear out of the way before we do that. If we stop everything from moving before we get this matter resolved, of course, it deprives others of having a chance to have an amendment considered. That is the effect of it. Again, the Senator has the right to do it, obviously, objecting to anything going forward. Any one Senator can do that. My colleague has as much right as anyone else to do it, but there is an effect on a lot of other amendments to that. I certainly would not argue about the Senator's right to do it, but the consequence of it is such that other amendments then do not go forward.
Editor's note · Context
Dodd discusses the implications of a Senator's objection on the consideration of amendments.
Share
More from Chris Dodd
The FTC's red flags rule implementing section 114 of the FACT Act became effective on January 1, 2008. The rule applied to ``creditors,'' defined under the FACT Act the same way as in the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, ECOA, to include any…
In places where things really work, it's because there's intense coordination going on between schools, church programs, after-school programs, local business.
There has been a very constructive and positive role that Brazil has played regionally as well, and very exciting.
it was a great honor to have Father Gregoire Fluet, my parish priest in East Haddam, CT, provide the opening prayer this morning. I thank him immensely for his words. Reaching back to Archbishop Carroll was a wonderful way to begin the…





