I believe the focus of this resolution was skewed at best. Instead of investing critical dollars in modernizing our nation's aging schools, in providing a comprehensive prescription drug benefit for seniors, in protecting our natural environment, or in reducing our national debt, this resolution chose as its priority a set of risky and irresponsible tax cuts that our country cannot afford. First, this budget resolution calls for at least $150 billion in tax cuts over the next five years to be paid for out of the non-Social Security surplus. This substantial tax cut will result in increased interest payments of nearly $18 billion dollars. So at a minimum, the tax provisions within the resolution have a real cost of $168 billion. The CBO has estimated that the on-budget surplus for the next five years will be $171 billion. The math here is simple, Mr. President. The tax cuts consume nearly 98 percent, at a minimum, of the projected on-budget surplus and leave nothing for other crucial investments.
Chris Dodd: “I believe the focus of this resolution was skewed at best. Instead of investing critical dollars in modernizing our…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing opposition to the Fiscal Year 2001 Budget Resolution during Senate debate.
Share
More from Chris Dodd
But, whether such a temptation is motivated by a noble desire to speed up the legislative process or by pure political expedience, I believe such changes would be unwise. To my fellow Senators who have never served a day in the minority, I…
I rise today to pay tribute to a good friend and former colleague of mine, former Congressman Stephen Solarz, who passed away late last month at the age of 70. I would like to take this moment to convey my heartfelt condolences to…
Forging partnerships among equals means by definition that we cannot get our own way all of the time.
I frankly don't see the sovereignty issue as playing a role as an impediment as much as the sheer ability of the cartels to corrupt.





