Briefly, it seems to me, a 24-month delay on this--I supported means testing, but I think we ought to know the full implication of what we are doing, and while there is a loss of revenue here by not implementing, it is for 2 years. It seems to me that proceeding with a degree of caution to make sure all the people that we want to benefit will be benefited and those to be excluded will be excluded properly, is not a lot to ask. I urge the proposal of the Senator from Massachusetts be adopted. It seems to me we ought not to be fighting over 24 months. We have agreed to means test. We waited a long time to get to this. Now we should do it intelligently.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a 24-month delay on means testing during Senate debate.
Share
More from Chris Dodd
The FTC's red flags rule implementing section 114 of the FACT Act became effective on January 1, 2008. The rule applied to ``creditors,'' defined under the FACT Act the same way as in the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, ECOA, to include any…
But, whether such a temptation is motivated by a noble desire to speed up the legislative process or by pure political expedience, I believe such changes would be unwise. To my fellow Senators who have never served a day in the minority, I…
Rosa, go get yourself well. Your job is here. Your salary is here. Just take care of yourself.
with some reluctance, I rise to talk about this issue. Having given what I thought was my last set of remarks on the floor a week or so ago, I thought I would let it lie there rather than come over. But this is such an important matter. In…





