The suggestion somehow that this process excludes local property owners from expressing their opinions is just not the case. In fact, it is very, very clear, as laid out by the Executive order, how the process would work. Certainly local input and people expressing their views, whether or not they are in favor or opposed to this, is very much a part of the process here. This is complicating it by mandating through law. The implication here obviously is that Congress is going to make the decision as to whether or not these rivers in various areas are going to be designated so you have a vote of 51 to 49 picking this river or that. We are trying to avoid that, to keep the politics out of it. If you go back and look at how it works, it requires that there be local input and approval and support at the local level. That is the whole idea. Obviously, to have Washington sit here and pick 10 rivers, we don't know whether you want to be designated. So this is entirely superfluous. The process exists right now that requires that effort. Support from local communities is all through the Executive order from the administration as to how this would work.
On the recordSeptember 18, 1997
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of local input in the designation of rivers during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Chris Dodd
Nov 30, 2010
Well, they're going to have quite a stage now, with the World Cup and the Olympics coming up in the next few years.
Nov 30, 2010
Brazil aspires to a place on the U.N. Security Council, as a member of the so-called BRICs, sees itself as the wave of the future.
Dec 16, 2010
I rise today to say thank you to the wonderful staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Earlier this week I had the privilege of chairing my final hearing in that committee, and I want to take a moment to extend my thanks and…
Nov 30, 2010
I appreciate my colleague's kind comments about my imminent departure after 30 years on this committee and in the Senate.





