In this amendment, we took Public Law 102-526, section VI, entitled ``Grounds for Postponement of Public Disclosure of Records.'' This is the so-called ``Kennedy assassination'' language. What I did is I took the exact language--all of the language, which provides the exemptions of where this information should not be provided, and I took the word ``assassination'' and replaced it with the words ``human rights.'' Here is an example. Reading from the existing law: Disclosure of assassination records and of particular information to the public may be postponed subject to the limitations of the act. We write: Disclosure of human rights records. 1. Threat of military defense intelligence, conduct, foreign relations, and so forth. Intelligence agents, intelligence sources, and other matters currently related to the military defense. All the way down this entire language, all we did is replace the words ``human rights'' for ``assassinations'' when it comes to Honduras and Guatemala. We added an additional provision that is not in the Kennedy assassination statute. In addition, the amendment provides that ``a document may remain classified if its public disclosure would be expected to reveal the identity of a confidential human source.''
Chris Dodd: “In this amendment, we took Public Law 102-526, section VI, entitled ``Grounds for Postponement of Public Disclosure of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to the disclosure of human rights records.
Share
More from Chris Dodd
I rise today to express my strong support for the nomination of Judge Robert Chatigny to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Judge Chatigny is an individual of outstanding character, keen intellect, and extensive…
first of all, let me express my gratitude to all of the colleagues and other individuals who have come to the Chamber at this moment. Everyone who serves in Congress usually recalls two moments in their service: the maiden speech they give…
The polarization we see in Congress and in politics here today has a damaging effect on foreign policy.
In fact, it was the uncertainty inherent in a nontransparent and reckless financial system that made Dodd-Frank necessary in the first place.





