Here is what we are doing. There are those who believe if you have any kind of a dike, dam or levee, that you should not have to pay for flood insurance. We cannot tolerate that in a sense. We have 130 dams, levees, and dikes that are at great risk of one kind or another in these residual risk areas. About 25 percent all the claims against the flood insurance program come out of these residual risk areas, not the coastline. Clearly, having dikes, levees, and dams help. The fact is, the reason there is a dike, levee or dam is because it is in a residual risk area. Anything made by man or nature, there is no guarantee in perpetuity it is going to survive, even the 250 years about which we talked. What better example than Louisiana. We spent millions of dollars on a system down there that didn't work, ultimately. The idea of having someone pay a maximum of $350,000 worth of insurance--actually, the average cost is $316 a year.
On the recordMay 8, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing flood insurance and the risks associated with levees and dams.
Share
More from Chris Dodd
Dec 16, 2010
I rise today to pay tribute to a good friend and former colleague of mine, former Congressman Stephen Solarz, who passed away late last month at the age of 70. I would like to take this moment to convey my heartfelt condolences to…
Oct 30, 2011
The truth is that the catastrophe was years in the making caused by regulatory negligence and Wall Street gambling.
Nov 30, 2010
I would just make one observation: 75 percent of the population of Latin America are living in urban settings; 50 percent of the population living is under the age of 18.
Nov 30, 2010
The United States has lost its credibility on human rights in Latin America because we haven't practiced what we've preached.





