I note my good friend from Alabama is in the chair. His is always the first State on the list. But just to make the point, presently there would be some 10 million children in the country who would be served by title I out of the 55 million children who go to school. In the case of Alabama, there would be 192,377 children who would be served if we had full funding. That number today is about a third of that number, a third of the 192. If we go down the list--and what I have provided in the first column is what full funding would provide--and look at the number under your State and then calculate what one-third of that number is, you would get a rough idea of what the present number of children is who are being served. Of course, the number itself reflects what full funding would amount to in all 50 States. That is what this chart provides. As we know, our society is based on the promise of equal opportunity, not equal success. None of us bears an obligation to guarantee the success of anyone, but we all share the common goal that everyone ought to have an equal opportunity to succeed.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of funding on Title I education for children during a floor speech.
Share
More from Chris Dodd
The United States has lost its credibility on human rights in Latin America because we haven't practiced what we've preached.
today the Senate passed the CAPTA Reauthorization Act of 2010, S. 3817, and cleared it for the President's signature. This bill reauthorizes several important statutes--the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, CAPTA, and the Family…
I appreciate my colleague's kind comments about my imminent departure after 30 years on this committee and in the Senate.
I would just make one observation: 75 percent of the population of Latin America are living in urban settings; 50 percent of the population living is under the age of 18.





