I rise in opposition to the amendment being offered by our distinguished colleague from North Carolina. Let me say at the very outset that this debate is really not about a specific treaty or agreement at all. As the Senator from North Carolina has very candidly said, he is opposed in concept to the notion of an international criminal court. So there is no configuration of any such court which he could ever accept. There are those of us who believe that the concept of an international criminal court makes sense, but we are very cautious to reserve any judgment on what that court may constitute until we are offered such a proposal. We have not been offered such a proposal. What we have before us today in this particular piece of legislation is the simple expression of a sense of this body that, conceptually, the idea of an international criminal court makes sense. We do not endorse any particular proposal for such a court but merely state our opinion that it ought to be pursued.
On the recordJanuary 26, 1994
Editor's note · Context
Senator Dodd opposes an amendment regarding the concept of an international criminal court.
Share
More from Chris Dodd
Nov 30, 2010
I frankly don't see the sovereignty issue as playing a role as an impediment as much as the sheer ability of the cartels to corrupt.
Nov 30, 2010
We need to start thinking 'intermestically' about domestic immigration and international economic development policies at the same time.
Dec 16, 2010
I rise today to say thank you to the wonderful staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Earlier this week I had the privilege of chairing my final hearing in that committee, and I want to take a moment to extend my thanks and…
Nov 30, 2010
I appreciate my colleague's kind comments about my imminent departure after 30 years on this committee and in the Senate.





