I commend my colleague from California who has been patient and has done a good job. I describe her statutory language as sort of the exclamation point in this. As the amendment reads, the very first line--and, again, I don't have to read it--at the end of this title includes the following. So it is at the end of the title. It is complicated to get this right, so we have a winding down and a disposition in receivership and bankruptcy in these institutions. In case anybody had doubts about what the language does, the amendment says the word ``shall'' in every sentence. There are no ``mays.'' The taxpayer ``shall'' not be exposed. There ``shall'' be liquidation. It is very clear what we are trying to achieve. I know nobody objects. We are on the bill. We ought to be able to start on a positive note. We are going to have times of significant division and debate on this bill coming up. I thought it might be worthwhile for the American public to witness a Senate that can actually, as it begins debate, do so with some unanimity.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses an amendment related to bankruptcy and receivership in financial institutions.
Share
More from Chris Dodd
You've always understood that advancing justice for the peoples of the Americas puts the United States on the right side of history and advances U.S. national security at the same time.
I rise today to say thank you to the wonderful staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Earlier this week I had the privilege of chairing my final hearing in that committee, and I want to take a moment to extend my thanks and…
The truth is that the catastrophe was years in the making caused by regulatory negligence and Wall Street gambling.
We need to start thinking 'intermestically' about domestic immigration and international economic development policies at the same time.





