I will read a pertinent passage because this is really the heart of this issue. I mentioned earlier, one-third of all retirees get coverage under the private employer-based plans. If CBO is right, almost 40 percent of retirees will lose their coverage under this bill, and employers would start dropping them because they do not get the subsidies, then I think we have to understand what the implications mean for a lot of people. I do not believe my colleagues intend this to be the case, but this is what is going to happen if we are not careful. The letter reads in part: If the Medicare drug bill before the Senate, S. 1, becomes law, 37 percent of retirees who now have employer-sponsored health benefits will lose that coverage. That is according to CBO. That's 4.4 million retirees that will be made worse off if S. 1, as drafted, is enacted into law. Such an act will represent an enormous and irreversible blow to the employer-based system that is the backbone of our nation's health care system.
Chris Dodd: “I will read a pertinent passage because this is really the heart of this issue. I mentioned earlier, one-third of all…”
On the recordJune 24, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Medicare drug bill on retiree health benefits.
Share
More from Chris Dodd
Dec 17, 2010
I rise today to introduce the Combating Autism Act, CAA, Reauthorization. Six years ago, my former colleague Senator Rick Santorum and I introduced the original CAA to expand Federal investment for Autism research, services, treatment, and…
Nov 30, 2010
There has been a very constructive and positive role that Brazil has played regionally as well, and very exciting.
Nov 30, 2010
The FTC's red flags rule implementing section 114 of the FACT Act became effective on January 1, 2008. The rule applied to ``creditors,'' defined under the FACT Act the same way as in the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, ECOA, to include any…





