I find it offensive that anyone would suggest, because we disagree with the policy, we are somehow putting our soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen at risk. I strongly suggest, as does my colleague from North Dakota, that our continuing policy in Iraq has made us less safe, less secure, more vulnerable, more isolated in the world and, in fact, the very soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines we admire are in greater jeopardy because of a continuation of this policy. I will be joining with him and others as we try to bring this to a halt, not in 2009 or 2013 but hopefully this year.
Chris Dodd: “I find it offensive that anyone would suggest, because we disagree with the policy, we are somehow putting our soldiers…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of U.S. policy in Iraq and its impact on military personnel.
Share
More from Chris Dodd
with some reluctance, I rise to talk about this issue. Having given what I thought was my last set of remarks on the floor a week or so ago, I thought I would let it lie there rather than come over. But this is such an important matter. In…
I rise today to introduce the Garrett Lee Smith Memorial Act, GLSMA, Reauthorization. Six years ago, my former colleague Senator Gordon Smith and I introduced the original GLSMA to address the public health challenge of youth suicide by…
The erosion of democracy in Venezuela is now accompanied by rising crime and economic stagnation.
Maybe we ought to be spending a little more time looking at the relationships at that level.





