I have tried vainly over here in the last couple of days with some amendments--I don't know what the implications are; I appreciate his candor, in terms of not knowing the cost of this amendment--that would fill in the hole, to go from 160 to 250, for people in that category. The reason I offered it is it occurred to me if you are paying that much in prescription drugs, somewhere around $5,000 a year for prescription drugs, and you are making $30,000 as a couple or $22,000 as an individual, you probably have a pretty serious illness if you are paying about $5,000 in prescription drug costs. It occurs to me that during that hole, we might try to do a little more. We have done that, as the chairman says, very graciously for the desperately poor in this country. For those reasons, I urge the adoption of the amendment.
Chris Dodd: “I have tried vainly over here in the last couple of days with some amendments--I don't know what the implications are; I…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to prescription drug costs and assistance for low-income individuals.
Share
More from Chris Dodd
I would just make one observation: 75 percent of the population of Latin America are living in urban settings; 50 percent of the population living is under the age of 18.
first of all, let me express my gratitude to all of the colleagues and other individuals who have come to the Chamber at this moment. Everyone who serves in Congress usually recalls two moments in their service: the maiden speech they give…
I rise today to introduce the Combating Autism Act, CAA, Reauthorization. Six years ago, my former colleague Senator Rick Santorum and I introduced the original CAA to expand Federal investment for Autism research, services, treatment, and…
Rosa, go get yourself well. Your job is here. Your salary is here. Just take care of yourself.





