In order to do what you have suggested, of course, I would have to operate within the existing budget structure--which means I would have to take from one critical program--perhaps Head Start or education, to fund child care. I would have to make families compete against themselves. But if I want to take anticipated tobacco revenues or draw from the additional resources of a growing economy, as I understand it, I am precluded under this budget resolution from doing so. Out of that $300 billion or $500 billion in tobacco funds--whatever amount we ultimately decide here--I believe that $15 billion or $20 over 5 years can be found to commit to child care. But under this budget resolution, I would be subject to a point of order; is that not correct?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget constraints related to funding child care during a debate.
Share
More from Chris Dodd
The FTC's red flags rule implementing section 114 of the FACT Act became effective on January 1, 2008. The rule applied to ``creditors,'' defined under the FACT Act the same way as in the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, ECOA, to include any…
it was a great honor to have Father Gregoire Fluet, my parish priest in East Haddam, CT, provide the opening prayer this morning. I thank him immensely for his words. Reaching back to Archbishop Carroll was a wonderful way to begin the…
I rise today to pay tribute to a good friend and former colleague of mine, former Congressman Stephen Solarz, who passed away late last month at the age of 70. I would like to take this moment to convey my heartfelt condolences to…
The polarization we see in Congress and in politics here today has a damaging effect on foreign policy.





