I thank the Senator for that question because that is kind of the red herring that gets thrown into this mix. Yes, we all agree we don't think people who are on the no-fly list should get guns, but it is about the mistakes that are made. No, in Senator Feinstein's amendment--I know she will speak to it over the course of the debate--there is a process for individuals to remedy any erroneous denial of a firearm. So there is going to be an explicit process set up with which to do that. I think Senator McCaskill said this earlier; she remarked that the bipartisan reference is showered upon law enforcement. It is wonderful that we support our members of law enforcement, but then why don't we trust them to make decisions when they have information that would make them very worried about a specific individual buying a firearm? Why don't we trust them to make that decision if we all agree that we trust them to make other decisions to keep us safe? I yield for additional questions.
On the recordJune 15, 2016
Share
More from Chris Murphy
Aug 11, 2026
The price of this war is being plainly paid first and foremost by our soldiers, who are being put in harm's way for a war that is making America weaker every day.
Aug 17, 2026
Accordingly, we insist that the Postal Service abandon this proposed regulation and return to its core mission of providing universal postal services to every American. The Constitution and federal law demand nothing less.
Aug 11, 2026
I was glad that the president got a ceasefire [in June], but I could tell by the terms it wasn't going to last. It wasn't a real agreement, but at this point, many of us are willing to support almost any agreement.
Aug 11, 2026
Here's an explanation for why Trump continues to do this gaslighting, particularly right before the markets open.





