On the recordJune 14, 2026
It’s not a close call. We cannot extend these capabilities if the president is making clear that he’s going to use them not to protect the nation, but to protect himself politically.
Source
abcnews.comEditor's note · Context
On the implications of extending surveillance capabilities under Trump.
Share
More from Chris Murphy
Aug 12, 2026
This is not only an attack on jobs, affordable energy, and America’s economic competitiveness. It is an attack on the rule of law and the basic democratic principle that the federal government serves the entire country—not merely those who…
Aug 7, 2026
This long-overdue step will save millions in taxpayer dollars, cut red tape, and support economic development by allowing better collaboration between the Coast Guard and its surrounding communities – in places like New London…
Aug 11, 2026
I was glad that the president got a ceasefire [in June], but I could tell by the terms it wasn't going to last. It wasn't a real agreement, but at this point, many of us are willing to support almost any agreement.
Aug 21, 2026
Children deserve competent representation by attorneys who practice at the intersection of child welfare and federal immigration law, but Americans also deserve to know why their federal dollars are being doled out to Trump’s friends and…
Other voices in this conversation
