Political Quotes

On the recordDecember 13, 2018
once again, I urge rejection of this amendment. If passed, it would, again, render the underlying resolution a moot point. I would make two additional arguments against it: First, the entire rationale that the Saudis used for the military campaign in Yemen is to prevent Houthi attacks against Saudi Arabia. So if this was an exemption, then the United States could fully participate. Second, existing law already allows the U.S. Commander in Chief to protect U.S. troops against an attack or an imminent attack, and nothing in the resolution would take away the Commander in Chief's power to protect U.S. troops either here in the United States or abroad. For those reasons, I would strongly oppose--that we object to this amendment which, if passed, would essentially gut the underlying resolution. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question occurs on agreeing to amendment No. 4098.
Said by
Chris Murphy
Democratic · Connecticut
Source
govinfo.gov
Dec 13, 2018

Share

More from Chris Murphy

Aug 14, 2026

This body works best when the president's party stands up to him and says, 'enough,' whether it's corruption or incompetence.

murphy.senate.gov
Aug 8, 2026

No president has ever been so insistent on putting guns in the hands of violent criminals.

murphy.senate.gov
Aug 8, 2026

I just want to go through this pattern for you because it is really important to talk about the fact that the White House is just not being straight with the American public about what's going on in this war…

murphy.senate.gov
Aug 14, 2026

Americans deserve answers on how the administration has decided to spend their taxpayer dollars and assume new national security risks with the VC-25B Bridge aircraft and the rushed retrofit program contracted to L3Harris – all in service…

murphy.senate.gov

Other voices in this conversation